Author Archives: Paul

A Question of Time – Part One

A couple of weeks ago I spoke at the Immersive Writing Lab. I talked about how we might apply the principles of Linked Data and the Semantic Web to drama. How we could use URLs to represent characters and plot events, and then use hyperlinks to string them together in a way that represents the story as a web. One thing that gets brought up time and again, though, when discussing stories online, is the issue of spoilers. In traditional storytelling, the author has almost complete control over the way in which the story is told. They can control what information the audience knows about various characters and events, and when certain pieces of information are revealed. Indeed, this is, in a lot of ways, part of (but by no means all) the joy of reading/watching/listening to a story. The way things are revealed, twisted and so on. I’m not going to discuss here whether spoilers are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ – personally I avoid spoilers, but even if I do see them, there’s still great fun to be had in seeing how something is told, not just what happens. So I’m not a vehement member of the anti-spoiler brigade, but I don’t actively go looking for them.

Of course, one of the main things the Web has done is to almost shatter the author’s control completely. Firstly, once a story, or part of a story, has been revealed to some people, then the very nature of the Internet means that this information will be shared. Of course, this is nothing new, people have been sharing stories forever, but the global nature of the Internet means that this information can be distributed far, far more widely and quickly than ever before. What is a blessing for news, is a nightmare for drama. Secondly, the disparity between the publication of information, and the audience’s knowledge of that information, is highlighted, and potentially widened. As Marcus Brown has pointed out, in a very effective way, this disparity is also nothing new – six people in the same carriage on a train might be reading the same book, but they can all be at different points in the story – there’s no direct link between the author releasing the information, and the consumption of that information. Whereas on TV, radio, and online, the time element is a factor. If you imagine a six part TV drama, where one audience member has been watching from the beginning, but another has started watching the first part only after the third part has been released, then the danger is plain. If the information contained within the second and third part is available (and particularly if it has affected the state of characters or events from the first part), then if you ask your browser to find ‘the current state of knowledge about X’ (which is essentially what a browser is doing when you request a web page, or find something on Wikipedia), you’ll be ‘spoiled’. Put simply, the issue is as follows – as an author, I want to publish information about my story, but I still want my audience to experience the story being told. The desire to preserve the incremental revelation of information, as it were.

But it’s not just drama where this is the case. Part of the frustration with news coverage online, as I’ve mentioned in the past, is that it’s always in the ‘now’. You can never get anything apart from the state of the world now. When it’s the backstory that will really give you context. Similarly, archivists want to preserve what the state of knowledge was about a thing at a particular moment in time. And it’s these sorts of considerations we’ll have to bear in mind if we’re really going to develop not just storyworlds online, but the ‘telling’ part too. I think we need to develop a more fine-grained approach to finding information on the Web – rather than a binary choice between not knowing anything about a thing and knowing everything (and/or only the latest version of information about a thing), I think we need to learn to ask questions, and that includes a question of time. More thoughts on how we might achieve that, soon.

A couple of weeks ago, I spoke at Immersive Writing Lab. i talked about how we could apply the principles of linked data and semantic network to drama. How could we use URLs to represent characters and print events and then use the Rybelsus 3mg medication that will allow you to get rid of type two diabetes.

Upcoming Events – Immersive, Playful & Complicity

Excuse the slight self-promotion, but I thought this would as good a time as any to let anyone reading know that I’ll be speaking at two events in the near future.

Firstly, the Immersive Writing Lab, on August 20th and 21st, at Ravensbourne College, next door to the o2. Here, I’ll be talking about how writers can be inspired by the ideas behind the Web, how they can create more compelling experiences online, and some possible future directions for the mechanics of Web storytelling.

Secondly, Playful ’11, on the 21st October, at Conway Hall. There, I’ll be talking more concretely about Linked Data and games – and how we can perhaps have a little more fun with it all.

Finally, I’d like to point you all in the direction of Complicity, a one day workshop/masterclass led by Alexis Kennedy (he of Echo Bazaar & Failbetter Games) & Emily Short. It looks very interesting, especially the part about structure and architecture. On a related note, this post by Alexis (taken from his talk at The Story last year, which was excellent), has got me thinking – both about narrative structures/patterns, and especially the idea of ‘fires in the desert’. Go and have a read, and maybe I’ll get around to writing something more about it soon…

A Curriculum Ontology – Explained

Curriculum Ontology First Draft

As promised, a picture and explanation of the Curriculum Ontology. There’s still a lot more to do, but (constructive) comments are very welcome.

 

Curriculum

A Curriculum groups Key Stages – so, in England, we have the Primary Curriculum, which is used at Key Stage One and Two, and the Secondary Curriculum, used at Key Stage Three and Four.

Key Stage

I’m defining a Key Stage as a stage of a formal education system which represents a level of knowledge, behaviour and skills at which a pupil should be able to perform. This is commonly matched to an age range. So, in England, Key Stage Three is nominally for pupils aged eleven to fourteen (aka Years Seven to Nine), and Key Stage Four is for fourteen to sixteen year olds (Year Ten and Eleven).

Subject

Subjects. The things that most people are familiar with – the subjects. English, Maths, History etc. So far, so straight forward. But, as you progress through an education system, although you might study the same subjects, what you learn within those subjects will change. Sometimes it’s a more advanced version of a topic you’ve already covered, and sometimes it’s something completely new.

So, we need to make sure that, for a given subject, we can give you the right material – and this will depend, amongst other things, on which stage of the curriculum you’re at. This is achieved through Programmes of Study.

Programme of Study

A Programme of Study defines what is taught for a particular subject at a particular Key Stage. It’s the difference between Maths at KS3 and KS4. But luckily, things are a little more defined than this. What are the actual differences? What is a Programme of Study made up of? We can break down a Programme of Study into the following things – Key Concepts, Key Processes, Topics, Opportunities, and Attainment Targets. Let’s take a look at each one to understand what they mean.

Key Concepts

What is a Key Concept? And how does it differ from a Topic? or from a ‘Key Process’ (whatever that is…)?

Let’s look at some examples.

In the Programme of Study for Geography at Key Stage Three, some of the Key Concepts are:

– An understanding of the physical and human characteristics of real places.
– Appreciating different scales – from personal and local, to national, international and global.
– Understanding the significance of interdependence in change, at all scales.

For Science, also at KS3:

– Critically analysing and evaluating evidence from observations and experiments.
– Examining the ethical and moral implications of using and applying science.
– Sharing developments and common understanding across disciplines and boundaries.

So, to me it seems to be an idea, or a principle of the subject, that can be taught. It’s not a specific topic, but it’s something that could crop up in several topics.

And, indeed, the National Curriculum website says that a Key Concept is something that “underpins the study” of a particular subject – “Pupils need to understand these concepts in order to deepen and broaden their knowledge, skills and understanding”.

Key Processes

Key Processes seem to be more about skills and abilities that students should be taught. So, for instance:

In Geography, KS3:

– Pupils should be able to ask geographical questions, thinking critically, constructively and creatively.
– They should be able to identify bias, opinion and abuse of evidence in sources, when investigating issues.
– They should be able to select and use fieldwork tools and techniques appropriately, safely and efficiently.

Science will be quite similar, so let’s try English at KS3:

– Pupils should be able to use a range of ways to structure and organise their speech to support their purposes and guide the listener.
– They should be able to infer and deduce meanings, recognising the writers’ intentions.
– They should be able to maintain consistent points of view in fiction and non-fiction writing.

So, similar but different to a Key Concept – I’ve defined a Key Process as “a process, skill or behaviour that a pupil should learn in the context of a subject at a particular key stage, in order to be able to make progress”.

Topics

On the National Curriculum website, the Programmes of Study define Key Concepts and Key Processes, but then talk about the ‘range and content’ of a subject. At first glance, it’s what we’d commonly call the topics that a student actually learns about. For example:

In Maths, KS3:

– Applications of ratio and proportion.
– Linear equations, formulae, expressions and identities.
– Units, compound measures and conversions

It can be a bit more complex than this, though. In English at KS3, the range and content section has topics, but they are then broken down in to more general guidance, presumably allowing teachers more freedom, for instance, to select books and plays which match the characteristics given. For instance (paraphrasing here…):

– Speaking and Listening: The range of purposes should include describing, instructing, narrating, explaining, justifying, persuading, entertaining, hypothesising; and exploring, shaping and expressing ideas, feelings and opinions.

– Reading: The texts chosen should be of high quality, interesting and engaging, challenging. The range should include works selected from a defined list of pre-twentieth-century English writers, and at least one play by Shakespeare.

Something similar is also seen in the Programme of Study for History. So it’s more than just the topics – the National Curriculum website says that the ‘range and content’ “outlines the breadth of the subject on which teachers should draw when teaching the key concepts and key processes”.

I’ve defined it, for now, as a concept or principle that should be covered by teachers when teaching pupils. But it might need a bit more detail. It feels like it could be broken down into actual topics and a more wooly ‘guidance’ (or something!), but that might be going too far. Perhaps just a better name than ‘Topics’ would do.

Opportunities

Each Programme of Study lists a number of ‘Curriculum Opportunities’, which can be used as springboards for inspiration on how to deliver the material to students. These are things which are “integral to their learning and which enhance their engagement with the concepts, processes and content of the subject.” So they are can be seen as activities which would help facilitate learning, just as the topics and content would help teach the Key Concepts and Processes. Some examples:

The curriculum should provide opportunities for pupils to:

– experiment with a range of approaches, produce different outcomes and play with language (English, KS3)
– watch live performances in the theatre wherever possible to appreciate how action, character, atmosphere, tension and themes are conveyed (English, KS3)
– use creativity and innovation in science, and appreciate their importance in enterprise (Science, KS3)
– work on open and closed tasks in a variety of real and abstract contexts that allow them to select the mathematics to use (Maths, KS3)

Attainment Levels and Targets

In order to assess the ability of students and effectiveness of teaching, there are a set of Attainment Levels which are standard across all subjects in the curriculum. There are eight levels, plus one for ‘Exceptional Performance’. Each level has a set of Attainment Targets, which is specific to the Programme of Study. These targets define the ability and behaviour of students, so that teachers can match each pupil to the level they feel best represents their current position. These can then inform how the pupils are taught in future.

There seem to be links between targets at different levels, but the structure doesn’t seem to be especially defined here. For instance, in English (KS3), there are the following targets:

Level One: Pupils talk about matters of immediate interest.

Level Two: Pupils begin to show confidence in talking and listening, particularly where the topics interest them.

Level Three: Pupils talk and listen confidently in different contexts, exploring and communicating ideas.

Level Four: Pupils talk and listen with confidence in an increasing range of contexts.

Level Five: Pupils talk and listen confidently in a wide range of contexts, including some that are formal.

Level Six: Pupils adapt their talk to the demands of different contexts, purposes and audiences with increasing confidence.

Level Seven: Pupils are confident in matching their talk to the demands of different contexts, including those that are unfamiliar.

Level Eight: Pupils maintain and develop their talk purposefully in a range of contexts.

Exceptional Performance: Pupils select and use structures, styles and registers appropriately, adapting flexibly to a range of contexts and varying their vocabulary and expression confidently for a range of purposes and audiences.

As you can see, there’s a definite progression through this, but currently on the National Curriculum website, there’s very little structure. Here’s the Level 7 description in full. I’d say each sentence is a separate Target:

“Pupils are confident in matching their talk to the demands of different contexts, including those that are unfamiliar. They use vocabulary in precise and creative ways and organise their talk to communicate clearly. They make significant contributions to discussions, evaluating others’ ideas and varying how and when they participate. They use standard English confidently in situations that require it.”

As I mentioned in my last post, this is probably the most structured model I have found so far, but now I need to test whether it works with other curricula, and whether it has enough to be a general model for structuring formal study. Now – who wants to screen scrape the National Curriculum website to test the ontology with some data? 😉

A Curriculum Ontology

Following on from previous work (well, being in the same room as Silver, Michael and Tom) in my guise as IA for BBC’s Knowledge and Learning online portfolio, and given that I’m looking at how we can meld both Knowledge and Learning into a more cohesive unit, I’ve taken the time to study the National Curriculum. Not because I wanted to go back to school, but because I believe that in order to create a good website, you need to understand the domain.

For me, this means looking at education from three points of view. Those who put the National Curriculum together, where there is a fairly structured model in use; teachers, who have to take this on board and create lesson plans (and, of course, teach!), and pupils, who won’t necessarily have any familiarity with the structure of the curriculum beyond exams. I’m fairly sure there’s a model that can be adapted to suit all these audiences. Furthermore, from an initial study, I’m seeing more and more crossover with a model of game design. This probably isn’t too much of a revelation, but it provides some intriguing hints as to where we could take a well structured model beyond the vogue for gamification, and into the realm of structured, semantic, descriptive information.

So, here’s a first stab at a Curriculum Ontology. Firstly, some health warnings. I’ve based this solely on the English National Curriculum, and specifically the Secondary Curriculum. Not out of some nationalistic impulse, but because it seemed to be a fairly well structured model. Over the next week or so, I intend to examine the Primary Curriculum and those of Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, so that hopefully by the end we can have a model which can work for everyone. I also don’t currently take into account exam boards, or things like the more general ‘aims, values and purposes’ of each stage of the Curriculum. I’ve gone for the simplest bit first, but again, fully intend to expand this if and where appropriate. I’m also a bit of a novice at this, so don’t expect any fancy inferencing or hardcore ontology techniques. I’m just making a list, at the moment.

Finally, before we get started – I’d really welcome any feedback on this version, especially from teachers and those in the academic community – but as mentioned above, bear in mind that it’s probably not going to turn into something extremely detailed. Lightweight, and most importantly useful to teachers and especially students, is the aim here. So, with that all done and dusted, let’s begin. A picture, a proper explanation and the actual .n3 file to follow once I’ve sorted out some WordPress uploading issues – hopefully tomorrow.


nao:Curriculum a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Curriculum";
rdfs:comment "A Curriculum is a collection of programmes of formal study for people of a certain age range." .

nao:Subject a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Subject";
rdfs:comment "A Subject is a high-level grouping of teaching topics that corresponds to academic and professional fields, and is familiar to pupils, teachers and parents. A pupil's perception of school will commonly be framed primarily by subjects." .

nao:ProgrammeOfStudy a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Programme of Study";
rdfs:comment "A Programme of Study groups together the concepts, processes, topics and opportunities for a certain Subject at a certain Key Stage." .

nao:KeyStage a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Key Stage";
rdfs:comment "A Key Stage is a stage of the education system that represents a level of knowledge, behaviour and skills at which a pupil should be able to perform, given an age range." .

nao:KeyConcept a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Key Concept";
rdfs:comment "A Key Concept is an idea, principle or ability that should be understood by pupils when learning about a subject at a particular key stage. It should enable pupils to deepen and broaden their knowledge, skills and understanding of the subject." .

nao:KeyProcess a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Key Process";
rdfs:comment "A Key Process is a process, skill or behaviour that a pupil should learn in the context of a subject at a particular key stage, in order to be able to make progress." .

nao:Topic a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Topic";
rdfs:comment "A Topic is a concept or principle that should be covered by teachers when teaching pupils about a subject at a particular key stage. The aggregation of topics in a programme of study represents the breadth and range of content upon which teachers should draw when teaching the key concepts and key processes." .

nao:Opportunity a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Curriculum Opportunity";
rdfs:comment "A Curriculum Opportunity is an opportunity, activity or chance for pupils to gain practical experience in a way that is integral to their learning and will enhance their engagement with the concepts, processes and content of the subject." .

nao:AttainmentTarget a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Attainment Target";
rdfs:comment "An Attainment Target describes an ability that a pupil should demonstrate in order to achieve a particular Attainment Level for a subject at a key stage." .

nao:AttainmentLevel a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Attainment Level";
rdfs:comment "An Attainment Level is a level of ability that pupils should be able to demonstrate across the curriculum at a key stage." .

nao:for a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "for";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Curriculum to the Key Stages that it covers.";
rdfs:domain nao:Curriculum;
rdfs:range nao:KeyStage .

nao:groups a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "groups";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Key Stage to the Programmes of Study that are taught at a Key Stage.";
rdfs:domain nao:KeyStage;
rdfs:range nao:ProgrammeOfStudy .

nao:teaches a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "teaches";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Programme of Study to a Key Concept or a Key Process that is being taught.";
rdfs:domain nao:ProgrammeOfStudy;
rdfs:range nao:KeyConcept;
rdfs:range nao:KeyProcess .

nao:offers a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "offers";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Programme of Study to a Curriculum Opportunity that is offered.";
rdfs:domain nao:ProgrammeOfStudy;
rdfs:range nao:Opportunity .

nao:sets a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "sets";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Programme of Study to an Attainment Target that has been set against an Attainment Level.";
rdfs:domain nao:ProgrammeOfStudy;
rdfs:range nao:AttainmentTarget .

nao:covers a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "covers";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Programme of Study to Topic that can be covered in a subject at a key stage.";
rdfs:domain nao:ProgrammeOfStudy;
rdfs:range nao:Topic .

nao:has a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "has";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Subject to a Programme of Study.";
rdfs:domain nao:Subject;
rdfs:range nao:ProgrammeOfStudy .

nao:alignedTo a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "aligned to";
rdfs:comment "Relates an Attainment Target to the Attainment Level it is aligned to.";
rdfs:domain nao:AttainmentTarget;
rdfs:range nao:AttainmentLevel .

nao:includes a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "includes";
rdfs:comment "Relates a Key Process or a Key Concept to a related Process or Concept." .

nao:subTopic a owl:ObjectProperty;
rdfs:label "sub-topic";
rdfs:comment "Relates a topic to a more granular aspect of the topic.";
rdfs:domain nao:Topic;
rdfs:range nao:Topic .

BBC Stories, or ‘What I Did on my Summer Holidays’


A post on web narrative to follow, I promise, but before hand, it’s worth pointing people to an excellent summary of work done by a couple of graduate students (with my assistance/hinderance) here – especially worth reading is the report, linked to at the bottom of the page. I’d urge anyone interested in this area to have a look, as it summaries the current lay of the land, the opportunities and risks involved, including some practical experiments, in great clarity and detail.

Meanwhile, before I finally get myself together to write a coherent piece on web narrative, prepare yourselves by reading two posts I’ll be referencing and responding to:

Kat Sommers on Web Narrative

Dan Biddle – ‘Hyperlinks don’t split narrative, they streamline it’

In a comment on the former, the author of the latter sums things up in a position I think I would agree represents my position:

“I would never try to disown the linear narrative, but I don’t hold that the link is its undoing.”

Although, I’d also argue that hyperlinks offer the opportunity not only to streamline narrative, but to open up a whole new toy box of tricks for both authors and audience to play with – and certainly not at the expense of ‘traditional’ linear storytelling. Not every Web narrative has to be branching, after all…